The Art of War Info

Explore new releases and best sellers in politics & government, sociology, social sciences, and philosophy.Read reviews, ratings and answers about your favourite author and books. Here you will find multiple options to download or read The Art of War by De Jomini,Baron Antoine-Henri. Don't feel like The Art of War is the right title# Check our community reviews and make the right decision.


Antoine-Henri Jomini was the most celebrated writer on the
Napoleonic art of war. Jomini was present at most of the most important
battles of the Napoleonic Wars. His writing, therefore, is the most
authoritative on the subject. "The art of war, as generally considered,
consists of five purely military branches,-viz.: Strategy, Grand
Tactics, Logistics, Engineering, and Tactics. A sixth and essential
branch, hitherto unrecognized, might be termed Diplomacy in its relation
to War. Although this branch is more naturally and intimately connected
with the profession of a statesman than with that of a soldier, it
cannot be denied that, if it be useless to a subordinate general, it is
indispensable to every general commanding an army." -Antoine-Henri
Jomini

Average Ratings and Reviews
review-bg

3.92

822 Ratings

5

4

3

2

1


Ratings and Reviews From Market


client-img 3.9
52
12
17
7
9
client-img 3.94
298
273
88
7
0

Reviews for The Art of War:

4

Jul 27, 2009

The Baron Antoine Henri de Jomini's "The Art of War" is an early classic on military strategy and tactics. With von Clausewitz, he was one of the more widely read scholars on the subject in the 19th century. His book tends to have an abstract, scholarly air to it that suggests that he was more of an "arm chair" theorist than a man whom he learned much from--Napoleon Bonaparte. Napoleon may have had general perspectives on warfare, but he was also someone who was able to be improvisational on the The Baron Antoine Henri de Jomini's "The Art of War" is an early classic on military strategy and tactics. With von Clausewitz, he was one of the more widely read scholars on the subject in the 19th century. His book tends to have an abstract, scholarly air to it that suggests that he was more of an "arm chair" theorist than a man whom he learned much from--Napoleon Bonaparte. Napoleon may have had general perspectives on warfare, but he was also someone who was able to be improvisational on the battlefield, and Jomini cannot quite capture that in this work. Nonetheless, a classic.

Jomini argued that: "Strategy decodes where to act; logistics brings the troops to this point; grand tactics determines the manner of execution and the employment of the troops." As Jomini's actual work begins, he identifies the six key components of the art of war:
"1. Statesmanship in its relation to war.
2. Strategy, or the art of properly directing masses upon the theater of war, either for defense or for invasion.
3. Grant tactics.
4. Logistics, or the art of moving armies.
5. Engineering--the attack and defense of fortifications.
6. Minor tactics."

The book itself, then, considers these elements of the art of war. No need to go into great detail. But some general points are in order. At one point, he emphasizes the importance of "lines"--interior lines, where one side has a more compact line and can move troops from one point to another with greater facility than the enemy; exterior lines, which are longer. If a smaller force, interior lines are critical; if a larger force, exterior lines may prove no impediment to success.

One facet of this book is his diagrams depicting various orders of attack (pages 188 and following). This tends, as noted earlier, to be pretty abstract. One hesitates to think that officers in the heat of combat will intellectually assess the various orders of attack and rationally choose one over another. Among these are straight linear orders (where the two forces approach one another in straight lines) to "en echelon" attacks, where the lines are arrayed in depth.

He notes in his conclusion that: "War in its ensemble in not a science, but an art."

So, if one might be interested in an analysis of military strategy and tactics from the early part of the 19th century, this is not a bad starting point. It is a classic on the subject, and, even if too abstract and academic, can be a useful book to understand the military in that era.
...more
0

Jul 25, 2011

As with Mahan's "Influence of Sea Power," I won't try to review Jomini's actual work (nor am I really fit to do so), beyond noting that Jomini's influence on the American way of war has been vastly underestimated. This particular translation, in fact, was made at West Point in 1862, as America was in the second year of the Civil War, and other renditions of Jomini had been studied by West Pointers before that time.



A curious mixture of dated material and what are likely timeless truths (much As with Mahan's "Influence of Sea Power," I won't try to review Jomini's actual work (nor am I really fit to do so), beyond noting that Jomini's influence on the American way of war has been vastly underestimated. This particular translation, in fact, was made at West Point in 1862, as America was in the second year of the Civil War, and other renditions of Jomini had been studied by West Pointers before that time.



A curious mixture of dated material and what are likely timeless truths (much like Mahan). As Jomini himself notes, technology and tactics change; people, politics, and strategy tend not to.



Being an 1862 translation, the language is perhaps a little more florid than a modern translator would make it; but this is very much the kind of translation that had a direct effect on American military thought. ...more
4

Jun 03, 2013

Read the "Art of War" for class. The author, a Swiss national, served in Napoleon's Grande Armee. The "Art of War" is essentially Jomini's take on what made Napoleon so successful. Previously, during the Age of Reason, European armies were essentially the discrete playthings of kings, like Louis XIV and Frederick the Great. The French Revolution changed all that; armies became national. Revolutionary France became a "nation in arms" to defend their Revolution against the kings of Europe. Read the "Art of War" for class. The author, a Swiss national, served in Napoleon's Grande Armee. The "Art of War" is essentially Jomini's take on what made Napoleon so successful. Previously, during the Age of Reason, European armies were essentially the discrete playthings of kings, like Louis XIV and Frederick the Great. The French Revolution changed all that; armies became national. Revolutionary France became a "nation in arms" to defend their Revolution against the kings of Europe. Jomini's "Art of War" was taught to several generations of West Point cadets, including many of our Civil War leaders. ...more
5

Jul 17, 2014

There's a reason this book has been re-imagined for business, love, life, pet-ownership, etc. etc. If you have half-a-brain, you can draw these conclusions yourself from the translated sources material. Half poetry, half military tactical manual. So relevant today, it's hard to believe it was written 2000+ years ago.
3

Jan 07, 2015

This was an interesting, but exhausting read...good book to read at least once, perhaps twice.
5

Dec 26, 2012

Very interesting book. Complex and very detailed, but definitely a MUST READ in Military Strategy.
2

Apr 14, 2016

The more I read classics that are must reads, the more I enjoy the stuff I pick out on my own.
4

Feb 04, 2016

Surprisingly quick and easy read. At times the notes on why it was translated a certain way were bulky and unnecessary, but otherwise an enjoyable read.
4

Nov 22, 2015

If Stannis Baratheon, from the house of Baratheon, the first of his men, the true king of seven kingdoms, the Lord of Dragonstone had read this he could not have lost the battles :)
3

Mar 24, 2016

Fascinating instruction on how to lead men in war. Most practical 100 years ago, yet still relevant. Might be a great read prior to reading any civil war or napoleonic war story.
5

Apr 18, 2010

A must read for anyone in business and management. I have to re-read this book as it is one of the harder reads.
4

May 14, 2012

Highly influential even today! Jomini and Clausewitz offer two different looks at the nature of war and how it is fought. Both are important and should be studied together.
5

Sep 04, 2013

This is one of the great classics of western military thinking. It is one of many books I read during the time that I served as an officer in the U.S. Army.

For more, please see my review of On War by von Clausewitz.
4

Aug 13, 2010

Only edition of this classic I've read, so I can't compare it to others. The book itself contain much of historical and philosophical interest. I have a feeling I'll be rereading various parts as time goes by.
3

Aug 17, 2012

There's a lot of Clausewitz running through Jomini's thoughts. Spends most of Chapter 3 talking about operational level strategy - lines of operation and strategic movement. Valuable, but in the general sense. Lines of operation and the movement of large armies will most likely never be my forte. That said, the definition of various terms such as lines of operation, strategic lines and the function and interplay of bases of operation are a key contribution.
1

Jan 19, 2016

Considering this book is a classic, I found it to be a bit slow and boring. The book is quite short and straightforward, but some parts can definitely be condensed. Then again, the text is translated, so editing it too much would not be true to the original. I read it because many say the strategies are applicable to business management. I can see some of the points working, which others may need some stories/comparisons for me to get the picture.

I personally did not enjoy the book, so it seems Considering this book is a classic, I found it to be a bit slow and boring. The book is quite short and straightforward, but some parts can definitely be condensed. Then again, the text is translated, so editing it too much would not be true to the original. I read it because many say the strategies are applicable to business management. I can see some of the points working, which others may need some stories/comparisons for me to get the picture.

I personally did not enjoy the book, so it seems unfair to give it 1 star. ...more
0

Mar 18, 2009

I read this as part of my War Studies course way back in 1979. Now have my own copy. It's a bit more practical than Clausewitz, in other words it deals more with the conduct of war than the theory. This makes it seem a little more dated than Clausewitz, but only if you believe the Clausewitzian theory, which is very much based on 'war by the nation-state'. Jomini is the book for the Napoleonic wargamer! Or the student of Napoleonic military strategy and tactics.

I'm still technically reading I read this as part of my War Studies course way back in 1979. Now have my own copy. It's a bit more practical than Clausewitz, in other words it deals more with the conduct of war than the theory. This makes it seem a little more dated than Clausewitz, but only if you believe the Clausewitzian theory, which is very much based on 'war by the nation-state'. Jomini is the book for the Napoleonic wargamer! Or the student of Napoleonic military strategy and tactics.

I'm still technically reading this, though it's been put to my 'pending more time' section of the shelf. ...more
1

Mar 02, 2015

The version I read had commentary on what was meant by the writings according to various Chinese generals and such as well as examples that ranged from the ancient to Hannibal, Stonewall Jackson and such. Still, this was not a very engaging read considering its classic status. My secondary purpose was to collect quotable phrases, and that I did.

(Bob Sutton's rendition of Lionel Giles' translation along with the the Samuel B. Griffith text with "voluminous notes along with numerous footnotes." The version I read had commentary on what was meant by the writings according to various Chinese generals and such as well as examples that ranged from the ancient to Hannibal, Stonewall Jackson and such. Still, this was not a very engaging read considering its classic status. My secondary purpose was to collect quotable phrases, and that I did.

(Bob Sutton's rendition of Lionel Giles' translation along with the the Samuel B. Griffith text with "voluminous notes along with numerous footnotes." Formulated for the casual reader rather than Chinese scholar or even speaker.) ...more
4

Aug 05, 2016

This is a hard but riveting read. This is THE book that encapsulates the lessons of the Napoleonic wars. The Author was a staff officer under Napoleon, and on Regimental service throughout the period as well. This is the book that every Civil War General had probably read in the French original, but it includes several later other amendments. Lots to digest -but it is MUST-READ for any fan of the period, Military Strategy and Tactics, and especially Wargamers. Not a quick read- but well worth This is a hard but riveting read. This is THE book that encapsulates the lessons of the Napoleonic wars. The Author was a staff officer under Napoleon, and on Regimental service throughout the period as well. This is the book that every Civil War General had probably read in the French original, but it includes several later other amendments. Lots to digest -but it is MUST-READ for any fan of the period, Military Strategy and Tactics, and especially Wargamers. Not a quick read- but well worth it... ...more
3

Sep 12, 2015

It's said that every aspiring general in the Civil War had a copy of Jomini in his backpack. He does seem to write from a basis of good sense and much experience on the state of the operational and grand-tactical levels of war in the second quarter of the nineteenth century. However, it will help you reading this book if you are intimately familiar will all European campaigns and battles in the period 1700-1815, for that is where Jomini gets all the examples he mentions. He gives careful It's said that every aspiring general in the Civil War had a copy of Jomini in his backpack. He does seem to write from a basis of good sense and much experience on the state of the operational and grand-tactical levels of war in the second quarter of the nineteenth century. However, it will help you reading this book if you are intimately familiar will all European campaigns and battles in the period 1700-1815, for that is where Jomini gets all the examples he mentions. He gives careful consideration to some topics no longer of much interest, such as whether cavalry should be armed with sabers or lances, what kind of breastplate they should wear, and how they should form up to charge. ...more
2

Aug 17, 2017

Not a good writer...too many words, tends to jump from thought to though. Def-ly valuable information for war strategists but you will break your head because of poor writing.
4

Jan 06, 2018

Jomini is a good thinker and analyst and really there is no undue anti Napoleon bias as some would suggest. Not everything he has to say might be agreed with but the thoughts are definitely worth engaging with nonetheless
4

Sep 05, 2018

I PERSONALLY found Clausewitz to be all around better. Yet, there are a few things in which the swissman shines, mainly for what concerns the tactical and operational level of war. A must-read for historical and military buffs
4

Nov 19, 2019

Read during "armed intellectual" phase. Thought it was too non-specific and hand-wavy, unlike Clausewitz. My opinion and knowledge base have grown since then, so I've come to appreciate both Jomini and Sun Tzu somewhat more.
4

Apr 06, 2019

The Art of War is a fantastic read, not only is it interesting to see Sun Tzu's work, but that of a later general who wrote about the tactics. At times the transition from Sun Tzu to the writer's voice was a bit jarring. Overall however, the book was a challenge to read due to what seemed to be an older writer style. But that only makes the book more appealing to myself, it is fascinating to learn what phrases used to have equal meaning to simpler terms we use today. I suggest anyone who has not The Art of War is a fantastic read, not only is it interesting to see Sun Tzu's work, but that of a later general who wrote about the tactics. At times the transition from Sun Tzu to the writer's voice was a bit jarring. Overall however, the book was a challenge to read due to what seemed to be an older writer style. But that only makes the book more appealing to myself, it is fascinating to learn what phrases used to have equal meaning to simpler terms we use today. I suggest anyone who has not read this book to do so. ...more

Best Books from your Favorite Authors & Publishers

compare-icon compare-icon
Thousands of books

Take your time and choose the perfect book.

review-icon review-icon
Read Reviews

Read ratings and reviews to make sure you are on the right path.

vendor-icon vendor-icon
Multiple Stores

Check price from multiple stores for a better shopping experience.

gift-icon

Enjoy Result