3.57/5
Author: Raymond Wacks
Publication Date: Apr 1, 2014
Formats: PDF,Paperback,Kindle
Rating: 3.57/5 out of 344
Publisher: American Psychological Association / Oxford University Press
Check out new releases and top picks in criminal law, business law, constitutional law and much more. You think Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) is the best you can download? Read over 344 reviews and ratings for Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) by Raymond Wacks. Read&Download Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) by Raymond Wacks Online
Nov 16, 2015
The progression of ideas is coherent (though minimal in content) and allows the reader to move in known paths even as exposure to legal theory and jurisprudence is gradually increased. Close parallels with sociology and philosophy pretty much dictates this, but still, well executed. All in all, a good introductory work.Jun 05, 2016
Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions #147), Raymond WacksJan 08, 2017
سلسله کتاب های مختصر Ùˆ Ù…Ùید از انتشارات دانشگاه آکسÙورد را به طور Ú©Ù„ÛŒ Ù…ÛŒ پسندم. کتاب ÙلسÙÙ‡ ØÙ‚وق را اما به جای نشر ماهی Ùˆ پیش از آن Ú©Ù‡ این انتشارات اقدام به ترجمه سلسله مورد نظر کند، دو Ù†ÙØ± با دو ناشر در ایران ترجمه کردند. یکی از آن ها همین خانم ÙØ§Ø·Ù…Ù‡ آبیار است. دکتر رØÙ…ت الهی Ú©Ù‡ خود نظارت بر این ترجمه را بر عهده داشته است، Ù…ÛŒ گوید ترجمه آبیار روان Ùˆ خوش Ùهم است. با این ØØ§Ù„ اما من قبول ندارم Ùˆ ترجمه انصاری را بیش تر Ù…ÛŒ پسندم. «ÙلسÙÙ‡ ØÙ‚وق» یک بیان تاریخی از مبانی نظری این دانش Ùˆ نیز تØÙ„یلی کوتاه Ùˆ سلسله کتاب های مختصر Ùˆ Ù…Ùید از انتشارات دانشگاه آکسÙورد را به طور Ú©Ù„ÛŒ Ù…ÛŒ پسندم. کتاب ÙلسÙÙ‡ ØÙ‚وق را اما به جای نشر ماهی Ùˆ پیش از آن Ú©Ù‡ این انتشارات اقدام به ترجمه سلسله مورد نظر کند، دو Ù†ÙØ± با دو ناشر در ایران ترجمه کردند. یکی از آن ها همین خانم ÙØ§Ø·Ù…Ù‡ آبیار است. دکتر رØÙ…ت الهی Ú©Ù‡ خود نظارت بر این ترجمه را بر عهده داشته است، Ù…ÛŒ گوید ترجمه آبیار روان Ùˆ خوش Ùهم است. با این ØØ§Ù„ اما من قبول ندارم Ùˆ ترجمه انصاری را بیش تر Ù…ÛŒ پسندم. «ÙلسÙÙ‡ ØÙ‚وق» یک بیان تاریخی از مبانی نظری این دانش Ùˆ نیز تØÙ„یلی کوتاه Ùˆ مختصر از آن ها است. ...moreMay 09, 2016
Her ne kadar kitabın tanıtım yazısında hukuk uygulayıcılarına ve hukukçu olmayanlara için hukuk felsefesini tanıtım amacı güttüğü söylense de bence hukukçu olmayan, bu konularda kulak dolgunluğu da olmayan birinin bu kitapta kaybolabileceğini söyleyebilirim.Jun 08, 2015
Unfortunately, this book is useless. The brevity associated with the Oxford Introduction series doesn’t work well when the intention is to give an introduction to such a large subject. Wacks leaves aside a lot of very important thinkers and gives only a very brief, unsatisfying and misleading account of many others, the ones who get a more detailed and adequate explanation being of Anglo – American tradition.Jul 09, 2013
A short introduction to the philosophy of law written from a Western (especially English and American) perspective.Jun 30, 2013
A brief run through of important figures in the history of Western legal philosophy and their main ideas.Dec 27, 2014
Great book. Highly recommended for law students, especially someone lazy like me lolDec 19, 2012
3 Ä‘iểm cho quyển sách + 1 Ä‘iểm ngưá»i dịch = 2 Ä‘iểm :))Jun 28, 2012
Kind of a law for dummies. I learned a little bit but some parts are really dumbed down or watered down. The feminist part is terrible and don't bother to learn about how law deals with civil rights issues. There are plenty of other books for that.Jan 27, 2013
Accessible, overview on the role of law. In a nutshell. But, therefore it makes you think; are we using the law in the right sense in our societies? There must be a better way where we could have virtues citizens and less law. Everything in life layer down in rules to follow. Is that goog?Jan 24, 2015
Interesting introduction to complex ideas and theories, but lacks clarity at some points (possibly due to having to cram so many different ideas into 100-odd pages). I think some key terms definitely need operating definitions (in layman terms) for the book's target audience to appreciate. Sentences can also be shortened for clarity.Mar 02, 2016
Things I learnt reading this book:Apr 24, 2014
This is a helpful introduction to the different philosophies of law. Some material was giving rather more space than I thought it should have, especially the post-modern theories of law.May 02, 2016
TL;DR: A broad, if irregular, introduction to the core issues of philosophy of law.Nov 02, 2013
This book was good in that it made me aware that, in addition to the idiots in Congress who are passing laws, we do actually have intelligent, thoughtful, reasonable people who are thinking, talking, writing, and analyzing law, too. But beyond that, I didn't particularly enjoy the read. It's a personal preference, though, and doesn't reflect on the book. It seems well organized and thorough and, surprisingly relatively easy to follow.Sep 21, 2014
Raymond Wacks writes in the preface to this book,"Brevity is not a virtue normally associated with the law...law books are weighty...this series, however, obliges its authors to slim down, to compress, to abridge - without oversimplifying the subject of the book".Aug 01, 2016
A concise survey of topics in the philosophy of law, some of it a revisiting of my coursework back in the early 90s when I was then mostly a naive undergrad, and most of it new and exciting and inevitably putting a quite interesting lens over current legal issues and concerns, which though given new intensity by the ongoing struggles with the nature, scope, meaning and purpose of law with regards to gender, race, oppression, power, rights, and so on, are nevertheless not adequately dealt with in A concise survey of topics in the philosophy of law, some of it a revisiting of my coursework back in the early 90s when I was then mostly a naive undergrad, and most of it new and exciting and inevitably putting a quite interesting lens over current legal issues and concerns, which though given new intensity by the ongoing struggles with the nature, scope, meaning and purpose of law with regards to gender, race, oppression, power, rights, and so on, are nevertheless not adequately dealt with in the foundational (metaphysical) and "law in action" (positivist, realist) approaches most law and jurisprudence practitioners are contended with. While these new topics are still being worked on and articulated and debated, what could be anticipated in the development of the philosophy of law, perhaps when a newfangled social order manages to crop up post-capitalism and post-jurisprudence, is something that could be sufficiently challenging to law's tradition and law's promise. Or if it were to be a post-order, then wherefor law. ...moreFeb 10, 2017
What a lazy introduction. It's like reading someone's lecture notes.Apr 24, 2016
A good overview, although the author's biases show through at times - particularly in the brief discussion of the "law and economics" movement where we see far more push back than any other section.Aug 31, 2018
CapÃtulos 2 e 3 têm a melhor introdução do debate Hart vs Dworkin que você acha por aÃ.Apr 19, 2018
Wacks在çŸçŸçš„å‡ ç« é‡Œé¢æè¿°äº†æ³•å¾‹å’Œé“德与æƒåˆ©ä¹‹é—´çš„关系,还有法律对社会å‡ç»“力的影å“ï¼Œä»¥åŠæ³•律是å¦å¯¹æŸäº›ç¾¤ä½“æ¯”å¦‚å¥³æ€§å’Œæœ‰è‰²ç§æ—产生结构性压迫。我个人第一é读有些åƒåŠ›ï¼Œç¬¬äºŒé读的时候就感觉出Wacks写的éžå¸¸ç®€æ´æ˜Žäº†ã€‚Feb 01, 2018
It may be brief but it does assume you have at least SOME working knowledge of philosophy and law. Wonderfully written and filled with relevant, essential content.Jun 05, 2019
Gotta love a truly “pocketbook†this was my go to read ... had it in my suit pocket and would take it out while I’m waiting rooms that don’t allow cellphone use...Nov 18, 2018
I started reading this book not knowing too much about philosophy of law, and I think I know more now, but I'm not sure that I won't forget it all in the coming days. I think that Wacks wrote quite well and the topics were mostly fairly interesting. I am slightly concerned that he wasn't giving a totally accurate explanation of some of what he was discussing, but that sort of rigour may just be a necessary sacrifice in such a short book. (I have this concern due to some slightly misleading I started reading this book not knowing too much about philosophy of law, and I think I know more now, but I'm not sure that I won't forget it all in the coming days. I think that Wacks wrote quite well and the topics were mostly fairly interesting. I am slightly concerned that he wasn't giving a totally accurate explanation of some of what he was discussing, but that sort of rigour may just be a necessary sacrifice in such a short book. (I have this concern due to some slightly misleading comments he said about a utilitarian understanding of rights.) Overall, a pretty quick, painless, and (possibly) educational read. ...moreTake your time and choose the perfect book.
Read ratings and reviews to make sure you are on the right path.
Check price from multiple stores for a better shopping experience.
COPYRIGHT © 2021
best2read.com