1
Dec 20, 2012
I kind of want to return
this book, but I don't think I physically can. I knew that going into
it, but since I own Celestial Gallery (normal-sized) I thought this
would be a better book and that I wouldn't just get 66 pages of Taras.
Just
to be clear to everyone perusing these books, Romio is not actually a
thangka painter. He's a thangka collector who claims to be a painter and
has fooled a lot of people. Spotting the variations in styles between
different artists is very easy to do if you've
I kind of
want to return this book, but I don't think I physically can. I knew
that going into it, but since I own Celestial Gallery (normal-sized) I
thought this would be a better book and that I wouldn't just get 66
pages of Taras.
Just to be clear to everyone perusing these
books, Romio is not actually a thangka painter. He's a thangka collector
who claims to be a painter and has fooled a lot of people. Spotting the
variations in styles between different artists is very easy to do if
you've spent time looking at thangkas, and it's even easier in this
version because the pictures are so large (and yet still cut-down from
their full versions. Why?).
Romio's books are clearly a group of
probably Nepalese painters who try to imitate each other to look like a
consistent person, but they're not. You can tell pretty easily who is
who by looking at water or flame patterns. Those are painting areas
where people are more likely to develop their own style of depicting
images, and they'll vary to a large degree in quality, though some of
it's just taste. The point is, at least a half a dozen artists were
involved in making these thangkas.
This book actually makes the
game of trying to identify artists kind of fun because it's the same
image over and over. A professional thangka painter won't vary in his
composition or measurements so much. In some pictures Tara's nose is too
low or too long or too high. Or the face is too round. You can't alter
measurements too much in the Menri style that is used for most images,
despite his claims to be a master of the Newari style that really only
appears in full force toward the back of the book. Also, one of the
Taras (in the Afterword) needs to bleach her upper lip.
Aside
from basically insane mandalas there's not a lot of visual variation.
Unlike Celestial Gallery, almost all of the backgrounds are totally
nature-filled, so it's lots and lots and lots of stylized trees and big
leaves and flowers and maybe repeating images of different emanations of
the central figure. Usually I buy these huge books for the stuff going
on in the corners, which is harder to see in small books.
On the
other hand, if you just want a ton of Tara posters to hang on your
walls, buy the book, cut them out, and frame them. It's definitely the
cheapest route to decorating a house. And it's a neat book to show
people. Otherwise, don't bother.
Update: On a more close
inspection, I'm fairly sure that a lot of these thangkas are digital
manipulations and not real. Parts of them are clearly real with the
marks of a hand-painted thangka and the rest are simply too perfect to
possibly have been painted by a person. I don't care how big they are in
real life; I've seen thangkas by master painters that are three stories
tall and they aren't as precise as the patterns in the backgrounds of
these thangkas. I lowered the score for the book based on this
assumption.
...more